Since the interested party has not paid the balance, you can provide him with a legal indication of termination of the contract and not have the advance he has paid you. A sales agreement mentions not only the date of its signature, but also the date of execution of the deed of sale. It would appear that the omission of the date was intentionally on the part of the buyer, as he wanted to make his way to escape the execution of the deed of sale. . There was no statement in the agreement that the value of the stamp duty of the property was 55.00.000/-. It also found that, in the unclaimed agreement with which assessee claimed . 55.00.000 /- and the stamp duty of the rule 2.20 Lakhs were paid. However, the ld. CIT (A) took into account the una named agreement, in which the value of the property was declared to rule 64.00.000 / – In this case, yes. the ld.
CIT (A) itself admitted that the subsequent agreement had not been concluded and that no settlement had taken place on the basis of that agreement, it is not clear how this is the agreement. . until 2016-2017. Nor is it as if the operation of another enterprise is affected by joint directors.9. In addition, the offending agreement, which has been certified as a notary, is examined. It is true that no activity of the enterprise has yet been carried out.5. The scholarly representative entered into a notarized agreement to plead that there was an initiation for . A document that is not registered as intended when a property is in the process of being traded. It was also pointed out that no recital was mentioned in this agreement, hence the legal sanctity of. ..
whose content is identical to that of exh`s non-agreement. 62 of the petition.3. These agreements were concluded by the parties in the context of the Commission`s objection. Original of the non-old agreement Exh. D Page 62 before the Court of Justice on the adjournment of the hearing (8). List of petition on 30.01.2019. Application for interim measures which will continue until the date of the postponed trial. Dispute between the parties with respect to D, at p. 62, in the Appendix to the Petition), which is declared, on behalf of Respondent No. 1, as an invalid agreement.
. this agreement. The second agreement, which is not an agreement, provides, inter alia, for an option in favour of the applicant to acquire those premises from the defendants at any time during the last three years. JUDGMENT:1 The present action is brought in order to recover the amount of the deposit granted under the holiday and licence agreement. Below what relates. Leave and license agreement that the defendant gave to the plaintiff on the basis of holidays and licenses and that the bail of the party 1,60,00,000/- was paid in case of return of the premises. . this unused agreement is not executed in accordance with the law and is not a registered instrument. This agreement does not apply even if it is not deprived of any consideration.10.
He is a scholar. on the property held by the petitioners. Subsequently, the two parties entered into an agreement where the late husband of Respondent No. 6 agreed not to claim a country surrounding land. argued that the applicants had relied on an alleged agreement whose signatories had to be identified. . . .